Friday, March 30, 2012

the house of glass


When I began thinking about interior product usage, as well as, household product usage I thought about the types of materials we are using.  One of which, is glass. Take a second to look around where you are sitting.  Do you see a light bulb? A bottle? A window? All products of glass, but where does the glass go when you’re done with it?

Glass collection points, known as “bottle banks” are very common, but what happens to the glass when we recycle it?  What products are being made, and do they fall into the down-cycling or up-cycling category?  After reading Waste Equals Food, I realized that glass recycling today is mainly a down-cycling process.  The use of recycled glass typically becomes components of other substances of less value such as concrete aggregate, countertops, bricks, etc.  However, I would like to see it become an up-cycle, as well as, a “Technical Metabolism” that consists of technical nutrient. In other words, a material that is worth equal or lesser value. 

Usually when you buy a product of technology you have the knowledge that soon it will be replaced by a better, faster, more advanced product.  However, what if everything was made of recycled glass? I got this idea when reading Waste Equals Food when they mention the byproducts of technology.  Then when watching the video, Rhoner Textiles, I realized we could see glass become a continuous circuit life cycle.

In current devices, we see a surge in the implementation touch screens.  Once I looked into what it means to be a touch “screen” I saw the following video promoting Corning’s “Gorilla Glass”.

A Day Made of Glass Video

Currently Corning is on the forefront of developing a world of glass.  However, my idea is expansive.  We need to develop a product like Gorilla Glass, but the glass would be completely made out of recycled materials.  Using this concept, the technology glass could be continuously recycled into more glass.  Then one-step further, we could eliminate the need for other materials to be used by making the glass devices interchangeable.  For example, if a phone became “obsolete” the entire phone itself would not become outdated, but instead a single chip inside would need to be replaced.  The chip could then be repurposed to develop new chips for new technological advances.  End users would get discounts for recycling unusable or broken products, but the “unusable” items would easily be recycled.  

Monday, March 12, 2012

What we can learn from Alice


As children our imaginations guide us away from reality and into a new fantastical world.  However, as we mature we often lose sight of our inner child as realities of life creep upon us and squash our imaginative nature.  This leaves us with quite the conundrum as we hear our mother earth echo the same requests again and again.  If we stop and listen, we can hear her whispers: “Help us make the world right again”.  “Will you be my champion”?   We say in rebuttal of the current state of sustainability, “this is impossible”.  She slowly shakes her head in disagreement and says, “Only if you believe it is”.

More often than I’d like to admit my mind wonders off one topic to an entirely new one within seconds. For example, while watching the video, Suzanne Lee on Ted.com, I realized on the screen behind Ms. Lee was this statement: The rediscovery of wonder.  Instantly my mind was transported to the cartoon, Alice in Wonderland.  In the cartoon, the creation of such a fantastical place alone plays a vital role in our concept of visioneering a sustainable future.  Our vision should be a fantastical one, but we are trumped by harsh realities that make it difficult to see beyond the current state of our world. 

In the video, Suzanne Lee talks of how she has scientifically reinvented a process for developing clothing. This would mean utilizing the IE principle, Design for the Environment from the book, “Closing the Loops in Commerce: A Business run like a Redwood Forest”.  Or more importantly this would mean design WITH the environment. By manipulating the process of an organism’s growth, she is able to sustainably grow her own clothing.  She has proved her system can work, and even sports a vest made from the tea and sugar base.  She is a pioneer of what it means to take a fantastical concept and grow it (literally) into an obtainable reality.

If we can grow our own products, then we can produce locally.  Cutting down on transportation cost, as well as, the use of crude oil.  By applying the concept of “clothes miles” we can see the foot print of consumption in the textile industry. In the article, Sustainable Fashion and Textiles, Kate Fletcher suggests a principle I would like to adopt as my own: Locally made, globally relevant. Promoting a viable option to global production.  Through this concept there is a celebration of localism, a pride in what one can produce.  We each know the status of our current environment.  We must now envision ways to use the bio-systems we know so well to develop new concepts for textiles.  This vision encompasses my second principle of IE, Optimize rather than Maximize.  Through locally grown products we can produce quality over quantity as our imaginations are stretched.  Also consumers are more aware of what it took to produce the product, therefore are more likely to partake in recycling.

Which brings me to my third principle, Using Waste as a Resource.  It is an exciting time as we see our current use of technology taking us to places we could only imagine before.  One of those end places means utilizing waste.  In the text Midcourse Correction, Ray Anderson suggests that this means we return to our traditional notion of waste.  This is a notion that innovates use for even the most “unusable” items.  For buildings, this can mean generating electricity from landfill waste and pollution.  In the article, Textile Futures, Bradley Quinn suggest this concept must also mean developing a system that solves the abundant post consumer waste while minimizing water pollution and chemical waste.


There is a place, like no place on earth.  Some say to survive it, you need to be as mad as a hatter.  So let us take these principles and become mad.  Let us retrieve our inner child and envision a fantastically real place where we each can make a difference in changing our world.  If within a 3 minute video we can be transported to a new world, why is it so difficult to envision a new world for ourselves?  The three principles discussed trickle to one concept.  This concept is the rediscovery of wonder.  Through wonder we can dream of possible solutions, such as growing our own clothes.  Through wonder we can seek a world where we produce locally.  Through wonder, we can take garbage and produce power.  Through wonder, we can do anything.  All you have to do is believe.