In
the 1923 movie, The Dance of Life,
Havelock Ellis said, “The sun, the moon and the stars would have disappeared
long ago... had they happened to be within the reach of predatory human hands”. Typically we as a society would not characterize
ourselves as a “predatory”.
However, what does it mean to be predatory? According to the Merriam Webster the first definition of predatory
means, “of, relating to, or practicing plunder, pillage, or rapine”. The second definition offered states,
“inclined or intended to injure or exploit others for personal gain or
profit”. Although one could
conclude that general knowledge of environmental sustainability is increasing,
one could adversely conclude the predator itself developed that concept.
From
the beginning of time human beings have plundered their resources. Whether it was carving caves into homes
or cutting down forest for ships, humans have benefitted from pillaging their surrounding
environment. Now as natural
resources become more and more scarce, we must see that the issue is anthropogenic
in its root. One predominate example
of humans disregarding their actions towards nature took place on Easter
Island. Early occupants of the island were highly successful in their beginning. However, as their population grew they
consumed a great deal of the islands resources without options of renewal. This consumption led to cannibalism and
an almost distinction of their people.
In the book, A New Green History
of the World: The Environment and the Collapse of Great Civilizations, author
Clive Ponting wants readers to know the horrors that emerge from depleting Mother
Nature. Ponting said, “…it is a striking
example of the dependence of human societies on their environment and of the
consequences of irreversibly damaging the environment”.
If
we, as a society, have this predecessor tale of decline then why would we not
learn from our mistakes and make a change before its too late? One can think of Easter Island as not
only an isolated incident, but rather as the world. Like the early inhabitants humans all over the world are
consuming resources. As the life
expectancy for humans increases there is a direct correlation with the further
depletion of natural resources.
According to data from the CRS
Report for Congress, male and
female life expectancy is anticipated to increase in the United States from an
average 77.2 years in 2005 to 83.1 in 2075. If, in 2012, we already see a decline in our resources then
it is imperative we devise a plan of action versus reaction.
Suppose
population growth is a key player in depletion, what does it then mean to be
overpopulated? According to Mariam Webster overpopulation is defined to be, “the condition of having a
population so dense as to cause environmental deterioration, an impaired
quality of life, or a population crash”.
However, not everyone agrees that population is the problem. According to the website,
overpopulationisamyth.com, the growth of population is slowing according to the
global total fertility rating.
Thus, even though the current population is on the rise, it will eventually fall.
Regardless
of who is right in the population argument, we have a current problem that
needs to be immediately addressed.
According to the 2005, Millennium
Ecosystem Assessment (MEA) “…some of the studies that do exist have found
that the benefit of managing the ecosystem more sustainably exceed that of
converting the ecosystem”. Thus,
we need to think “big picture” in our actions. Think of environmental sustainability education as a
disease. “If, on average, each
person infects at least one other person, the epidemic spreads…” (MEA). Lets us
then use our predatory nature to plunder, pillage, or rapine our imaginations
and gain a fruitful future.
http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/predatory
http://aging.senate.gov/crs/aging1.pdf
http://overpopulationisamyth.com/
http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/overpopulation
Hi, Kimberly,
ReplyDeleteYou make a strong argument and your use of the Easter Island story to support it is well done. Could you explain the sentence you cite by the ESMA, "…some of the studies that do exist have found that the benefit of managing the ecosystem more sustainably exceed that of converting the ecosystem." Thanks!
Hello, Dr. Armstrong,
DeleteThank you for you for your comment and question. The management of ecosystem sustainability exceeds that of converting the system because once thresholds of change have been crossed the system can change to a very different state. According to the ESMA changes occurring due to the, "dramatic growth in the demand for food, water, timber, fiber and fuel" can cause current ecosystems to become irreversibly damaged. In other words, sustainability needs to take place before we reach the point of no return.
Thanks!
Perfect, thank you!
DeleteKimberly,
ReplyDeleteI thought that your blog offered a very compelling argument supported by many thought-provoking points. Your opening definition of the word "predatory" I thought was very well worked into the concept of environmental sustainability as a whole. I also liked how you used words in the definition thoughout your argument, tying it all together. Great job there! You used many outside sources that made me want to read on, and do more research on how overpopulation can affect the environment. Even though according to the mentioned website population growth is slowing, I don't think that humans' careless actions will ever improve regardless of how big or small of a society we are. Once again, I think it all ties back into your defnition of "predatory", and how humans only do what they need to do for their own personal gain or profit. As unfortunate as that is! I liked the analogy of environmental sustainability as a disease, but what are some ideas you have as far as how we can "infect" those around us to reverse our harmful actions to the environment? I thought you did a great job this week!
Mallory,
ReplyDeleteThank you for your thoughtful and kind analysis of my first blog! I think we could take our predatory nature and turn it into something positive, as we would have personal gain from replenishing our resources. I feel like education is the only way to infect those around us. Whether that means going into schools and implementing recycling programs for children to learn early on that it is imperative we renew, reuse, and recycle or just having a casual conversation with friends and family members about what we can do to better our future. I think what it boils down to is we all need to start talking about sustainability!!!
Kimberly,
DeleteI think your first blog was very well thought out and written. I loved that you used multiple outside sources. It made your blog much more interesting. I completely agree with you that our resources have not been used the right way for a very long time. I loved how you compared the knowledge of sustainability to the spread of a disease because they really are so much alike. It is not always necessary to make huge presentations to get the word out about sustainability. If we all work together and encourage others around us to be sustainable we will see a change!